Marx and Engels plan to close the economic gap by nationalizing the "means of productions" would result in the working class having control of this part of society. In this case "nationalizing" means that the means of production would be owned by the public as a whole rather than an individual. This would allow more citizens to make profit off of goods and services. This public ownership would help to make sure more people have a lot of money, rather than a select few.
The second statement discusses a perfect communist society and how it would be ideal for the citizens living in it. They argue that other countries would see how working for the common good would be beneficial. From there, they would adopt the system. Then, communism would spread like wildfire.
A comparison of indigenous people from maroons is, indigenous people Have rights and their rights are based off, their history and their territory. But Maroons Do Not Have rights they were slaves that ran away. A similarity between maroons and indigenous people is that they were both a ethnic group that consisted of a dominant cultural people.
All of the above is the correct answer! :)
The answer to this question is suburbs
In 1975 one-third of American mothers with young children had to work outside their houses. Nowadays, the amount of mothers that work is the double. This means that two-third of American women leave their house and children to work. The fact that more women are working brought an increase in the demand of services related to housework such as cleaning and child care.
