What is the difference between acting "purposely" with respect to a result and acting "knowingly" with respect to a result under
the model penal code? question 4 options: a.to act purposely is to do something that requires planning, whereas to act knowingly is to do something, while aware of certain facts, which is unplanned.
b.to act purposely is to do something by choice whereas to act knowingly is merely to do something consciously.
c.to act purposely is to do something of one's own volition, whereas to act knowingly only requires that the defendant be aware of his action.
d.to act purposely is to act with purpose, aim, or design to cause a particular result, whereas to act knowingly is to do an act conscious of the practical certainty of the results?
<span> A person </span>acts knowingly<span> with </span>respect<span> to conduct or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense </span>when<span> he is </span>aware<span> that his conduct is of ... If a culpable mental state on the part of the </span>actor<span> is </span>required<span> with </span>respect<span> to every material element of an offense, such offense is one of "</span><span>mental culpability."
experimenting on animals is always unacceptable because: it causes suffering to animals. the benefits to human beings are not proven. any benefits to human beings that animal testing does provide could be produced in other ways.
When the IS organization and its resources are focused on efforts that support the key objectives defined in the managers' strategic plan for the business, the organization is in alignment.
C. that people disagree on whether to allow on animal testing because these two opinions obviously contradict each other and a, b, and c don’t make sense.
