Answer:
Mischel proposed that behaviors are determined mostly by "SITUATIONAL CUES". Up to that point, psychologists in his field had believed that "TRAITS" were responsible for a person’s behavior. Mischel’s idea has come to be called "MISCHEL'S COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE PERSONALITY MODEL", and the debate over it is known as the "PERSON"/situation debate.
Explanation:
Previously existing trait theories suggests that a person's behavior depends on his/her traits, and they are consistent in different situations.
Walter Mischel criticized this theory and suggests that the way people behave is determined by the situation they find themselves in, and not just the traits they possess. His idea is known as "Mischel's cognitive-affective personality model".
The debate between Mischel and the proponent of trait theories is called the "trait vs state" or the Person-Situation debate.
Correct answer choice is :
<h2>D) Ancient Greece was more reflective of the philosophy of direct democracy</h2><h2 /><h2>Explanation:</h2><h2 />
Feudalism in the Holy Roman Empire was a politico-economic policy of relationships among liege lords and enfeoffed vassals that made the base of the social structure within the Holy Roman Empire during the High Middle Ages. Greek cities set up democracies, most following the Athenian model, but none are as well documented as Athens. It was a policy of direct democracy, in which participating citizens voted quickly on law and executive bills.
Answer:
d. neurotransmitter
Explanation:
In this definition, Anna was very close to successfully describing long-term potentiation. However, her definition is inaccurate because she mistook neurons for neurotransmitters. Long-term potentiation is the strengthening of synapses (or the enhancement of communication) between two neurons. These patterns of synaptic activity produce a long-lasting increase in signal transmission. This phenomenon occurs thanks to synaptic plasticity, which is the ability of chemical synapses to change their strength.
Answer: C. Can-do
Explanation: Since Sasha does not have the luxury of training Randall on the job because he does not have the necessary skills, so she needs someone who has the necessary skills to access the job immediately, then Randall is eliminated due to the can-do factor. The can-do factor depends on skills, i.e. whether Randall is capable of doing something that is needed. It does not depends on motivation, character, personality, it simply depends on knowing the skills. So if he has the skills he can do something.
