Let's break it down. The first part, Visual, is what you see when you look at something, color, arrangement, font, etc... The rhetoric part deals with the persuasion. In conclusion, it's what we see and how we act or think when we see it. It is one's ability to understand what an image is attempting to communicate.
I'm like, way too obsessed with the 2000s and shouldn't know as much as I do. So, like, excuse me if I go a bit overboard here.
Fashion in the early 2000s was mainly form-fitting on the top (blouses were pretty big), while the bottom was more loose, like flared jeans or sagging your pants. Loose, trapeze type dresses (but like, structured on the top but completely unstructured past the bust. I don't think there's a name for that type of dress, it's just so weird and /such/ a fashion crime).
This started to change around maybe 2004-2005? ish when emo/pop punk started getting way more traction and Paris Hilton became a major style influence (like, I could write an essay about her genius. She influenced an entire dam/n generation and CREATED the Kardashians. What an icon). Jeans became tighter (if emo did anything right, it was getting rid of bell bottoms for good) and more low rise. Actually, severely low-rise (thanks, Paris Hilton). And the god awful whatever-the-heII-that-was dress was replaced by slip dresses (courtesy of our lord and savior, Paris Hilton again). Oh yeah, I also can't not mention the Juicy Couture tracksuits which were /huge/ in the early 2000s. (Also, I think tube tops were either early 2000s or mid-2000s, which was major because the partying scene literally exploded.)
TL;DR mostly form-fitting. If you need examples, just cite Paris Hilton or Juicy Couture.
Music editors help directors achieve their musical ambitions on films, and provide a crucial link between the film and composer
Answer:
C. Realists documented the increased free time of city dwellers
Explanation:
