There are four steps;
look at the obvious
analyze the artwork
decide on an interpretation
make a judgment
Explanation:
What distinguishes formal art criticism from other theories used to evaluate art? It focuses primarily on the art object itself. Which can be described as an "artist-centered" approach to evaluating a work of art?
Uhm... Is this a prank? That isn't any French I know. Looks like either gibberish or another language that is not French.
Author Thomas Malory definitely treats Arthur and Lancelot as the heroes of the Arthurian legends. In the Vulgate cycle, King Arthur is the supreme leader of all. His heroism was emphasized in The<span> Tale of King Arthur. As for Lancelot, Malory makes his name as a hero of the Roman Wars and cements his reputation as first knight of the Round Table by many chivalrous deeds after that. Malory also emphasizes Lancelot's relative success and not his ultimate </span>failure. In<span> the Noble Tale of Sir Lancelot du Lake, Malory emphasizes a clear picture of Lancelot as the best knight in the world, proven by his long list of brave and mighty deeds.</span><span> </span>
