1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ololo11 [35]
3 years ago
13

The following question refers to the map below.

History
1 answer:
labwork [276]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Can you post the map please?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why was the colonization of Africa, Asia, and the Americas shared by Britain, France, and Spain?
azamat

Answer:

economic reason

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Slovakia became an independent nation in 1993 when it split with
suter [353]
Slovakia became an independent nation in 1993 when it split with "<span>c. the Czech Republic". It should be noted that this shift occurred during a period of great ethnic turmoil in the region. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of specializing in the service sector?
Mariana [72]

Answer:

I'm not sure but I thin is B or A. The reason why I think this is because service sector means to transport goods like coffee and minerals. \

Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In batson v. kentucky (1986) and j.
Licemer1 [7]
Answer:  "gender" .
_______________________
5 0
3 years ago
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After completing the assignments in this unit, think about this question: "How has the Internet affected culture?"
    11·1 answer
  • One result of the opium war was that china
    5·1 answer
  • The first case of using two words as a scientific name _____. was introduced by John Ray was introduced during the Renaissance w
    11·2 answers
  • Which came first?<br><br> Modems<br> The first e-mail<br> Archie<br> Netscape
    9·1 answer
  • “We draw the line against misconduct, not against wealth.” Based on this quote, which of the following explains Roosevelt’s posi
    9·1 answer
  • Most of the explorers who impacted Texas history during the age of contact came from A. Germany. B. Spain. C. France. or D. Engl
    10·2 answers
  • Why did totalitarian leaders gain so much power in Europe and Asia?
    15·1 answer
  • What do you think you can all do right now that will lead to your voices
    14·1 answer
  • Which battle led to the mass displacement of Cherokee from their homes?
    15·2 answers
  • How much solar power was created in the us in 2020.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!