Answer:
Explanation:
There were a lot of factors -- most were not what Schlieffen expected.
1. France wasn't that easy to conquer. It took longer than Schlieffen thought.
2. Belgium did not respond the way Schlieffen expected. They fought Germany.
3. Russia was more flexible that Schlieffen thought. They mobilized quicker and were much more adept at using their forces.
4. In all, Schlieffen made plans that were inflexible and did not account for the way wars are actually fought.
none he already has ALL THE POWER
This citizenship is called a dual citizenship because let's say for example Mexico and America, that person would have citizenship to America AND Mexico.
I hope this helps you! :)
<span>Spain seemed to be the most likely to take total control of the land where the new colonies were to form. They had the strongest armed forces, had the most money, and were some of the best at going to new lands and conquering the indigenous peoples who were already living there, as noted by their conquests in Mexico in the previous years.</span>
Answer:
It depends on what you have been taught, but I would personally say negative because of the diseases that destroyed Native Americans and the rise of slavery.
On the flip side, if you're thinking of positive, it did help exchange new ideas and goods (the Columbian Exchange) between the worlds. It also allowed a safe haven for those persecuted (like the Protestants) and allowed countries to dump their inmates onto the new land.
