Answer:
B. Day, strange, at, underwater, and expectant
Explanation:
has the commas
Answer: Look back and reflect the their work
Explanation:
a pe x
Answer: (B)
Explanation: Because they are Jewish, the Franks, the Van Daans, and Mr. Dussel are in hiding to avoid being discovered by the Nazi party.
In order to complete the dialogues between Connie and John and between Erica and Manuel, we must take the context into consideration.
The answers to the first dialogue are:
- Yeah, right! One year is long?
The answer to the second dialogue are:
- That’s good. Now what should we do?
- I think I’m going to make the chicken salad
<h3>What is a dialogue?</h3>
A dialogue is a conversation that takes place between two or more people. For this question, we must choose among the answer choices provided which ones best fit the blanks, so that the dialogues make sense.
In order to choose the best answers, we must take the context of each dialogue into consideration. That means we must read the whole dialogue to find clues as to what is going on:
- In the first dialogue, John clearly does not think Connie should buy a new parka. She thinks it is absurd to wear something from last year, but he does not.
- In the second dialogue, Manuel clearly says something that leads Erica to talk about the menus. He also mentions chicken all of a sudden, which means Erica must say something related to chicken as well.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the correct answers to complete the dialogues are the following:
- What’s on your mind? (first dialogue)
- Yeah, right! One year is long? (first dialogue)
- That’s good. Now what should we do? (second dialogue)
- I think I’m going to make the chicken salad (second dialogue)
Learn more about completing dialogues here:
brainly.com/question/13307090
#SPJ1
Answer:
In certain situations, it can be affirmed that science causes damage to nature through its actions. It is that, although science in general at present seeks to improve the quality of life of people (and, therefore, improve the conditions of the natural environment), in many situations scientific action generates the opposite effect. Thus, for example, scientific advances in the exploitation of resources, while optimizing their use, harm nature by being invasive means for it (for example, fracking to extract oil).
