1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
3 years ago
11

How does the flowchart with the red and white boxes and circles fit into the structure of the article "The Power of Your Wallet"

?
It provides readers a brief summary of the article in case they don't want to read the entire piece.



It allows readers to see the effects of buying a fairtrade product in contrast to one that is not a fairtrade product.



It helps to break up the text in the article into sections, which allows readers to focus on one section at a time.



It allows readers to quickly see where their money goes when they buy products.


k12 6th grade
English
1 answer:
Sergeeva-Olga [200]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It allows readers to quickly see where their money goes when they buy products.

Explanation:

This is the main purpose of the flowchart in this article. The purpose of the flowchart in the text "The Power of Your Wallet" is to show what your wallet (your money) can actually do for you. Therefore, it allows you to quickly see how money is distributed. By looking at this flowchart, the reader is able to quickly understand and judge where the money goes when buying products.

You might be interested in
Decide whether each group of words is an independent clause, a dependent clause, or not a clause
RoseWind [281]
It's has a independent clause
6 0
2 years ago
Write a short story which ends with it pays to wait
amid [387]

Answer:

That lil

Explanation:

ching

6 0
2 years ago
1. What is the importance of economic interaction in our world?​
Luden [163]

Explanation:

After the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, West German families that had relatives in East Germany saw an increase in their income, and this growth in incomes was significantly higher than that of comparable West German families without such family ties to the East. 

Why did this happen? Are personal and family ties really so important to our economic outcomes that they result in systematic differences in income growth?

Researchers have studied this question and have found empirical support for the idea that social connections do, indeed, have large effects on economic outcomes. 

3 0
3 years ago
Sequoias are majestic trees. The towering redwoods found in the mountains of California are among the world’s largest trees. The
Blizzard [7]

Answer: A "most impressive," "grand names"

Explanation:

BECAUSE ITS RIGHT yay!

8 0
2 years ago
What inference can you make by contrasting the ideas in the first two stanzas of the poem to the last stanza?
tamaranim1 [39]
The correct answer to the first question (what can be inferred by contrasting the ideas in the first two stanzas of the poem to the last stanza) is D) The awful tempest rages all night long and terrifies the speaker of the poem.
The first two stanzas, through adjectives like "awful" and "gaunt", expressions like "spectre's cloak" and "creatures", and verbs like "chuckled", "whistled" and "gnashed", convey that the tempest was terrifying, which can be understood by the speaker's word choice when telling the reader about it.
The last stanza shows that the storm lasted all night when the speaker says "morning lit", and, by expressing her relief and how peaceful she thought everything was after the storm had passed, the speaker intensifies the idea that it had been a terrifying storm. So, the correct answer to this question would be D.
Answer A is not correct because nothing indicates that the speaker would be fascinated by the storm, rather scared. Answer B is not correct because the tempest is not saddened by the morning sun, on the contrary, the speaker shows his relief and peace almost with happiness, which can be inferred by the presence of an exclamation mark in the last verse. Answer C is not correct because the tempest is not saddened at first, it is scary.
The correct answer to the second question (what device did Dickinson employ to create the effect in lines 1 and 2) is C) Paradox.
A paradox is a statement that seems to be contradictory in logic, that seems to not be true, but that also is not false. The speaker creates an absurd effect by using a paradox to describe the tempest when she suggests a storm with gaunt and few clouds. So, the correct answer to this question would be C.
Answer A isn't correct, the device used by Dickinson couldn't be an hyperbole because that figure of speech would cause the contrary effect; the storm would be shown like something grandiose and extremely terrifying, with an exaggerated connotation. Answer B isn't correct because there is no presence of an onomatopoeia in both lines since there is no written sound. Answer D isn't correct because the storm is not personified with human characteristics, rather the clouds are "gaunt", which is an adjective that can refer to objects.
The correct answer to the third question (why did Dickinson most likely use the phrase "black, as of a spectre's cloak" in the first stanza) is D) to create a feeling of darkness and gloom.
The black spectre's cloak mentioned is an image that describes how the gaunt and few clouds created a dark plain sky that covered the earth and the heaven, leaving everything dark and gloomy. That was the storm's appearance. Therefore, the correct answer to this question would be D.
Answer A is not correct because, although the storm could have been a dream, nothing in the poem indicates that it was; on the contrary, the description of the storm going away in the morning indicates that it wasn't a bad dream, but something real. Answer B is not correct because the black cloak mentioned doesn't transmit a sensation of coldness but of darkness. Answer C is not correct because the poem isn't comic, not even slightly, and this expression makes it even darker.
The correct answer to the last question (how does the poet convey the seriousness of the storm) is A) She uses personification to emphasize the impact of the storm.
When the poet describes the storm as a "monster" whose "faded eyes turned slowly to his native coast", she is using personification to emphasize how serious the storm was, as if it were like a monster with eyes that can turn, and with power and strength. Hence, the correct answer to this question is A.
Answer B isn't correct because neither does the poet use paradoxes in the last stanza nor does she show the storm as majestic. Answer C isn't correct because she doesn't use informal language and the storm seems to have been very serious and strong, and not the opposite. Answer D isn't correct because she doesn't show the changes that are coming through metaphors, the poet actually shows only the peaceful feeling that was left when the storm was gone.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Can someone help me, please?<br>from to kill a mockingbird<br><br>how does scout view calpurnia?
    6·1 answer
  • "A Tell-Tale Heart" by Edgar Allan Poe is an example of A. a novel. B. a biography. C. a short story. D. an autobiography.
    13·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST
    7·2 answers
  • Have your been accused of holding a grudge
    5·1 answer
  • Read the excerpts from " The Royal House of Thebes " and " The Story of a Warrior Queen ."
    9·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of subheadings in informational text?
    15·2 answers
  • One of your friend is not attending science class lately .what you can do for him
    11·1 answer
  • The most basic part of a word that retains meaning is called a:
    7·2 answers
  • Which best describes the purpose of the bulleted subheadings in the document?
    6·1 answer
  • Strong storms caused extensive damage to the new bank.<br><br> What's the noun and adjective?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!