The revolutionary movements in various colonial and semi-colonial countries, which appear in different forms but which all have a profoundly anti-imperialist character, have caught the attention of the whole world.
From Morocco to Korea they have made themselves known to a greater or lesser extent and they are of a great concern to the capitalist governments, which realise that the capitalist development in these large and quite often densely populated countries is of utmost importance for maintaining the capitalist system.
As world imperialism has developed capitalism further in these areas, the masses of workers and peasants hit by capitalist penetration play a bigger role. For a long time the revolutionary nationalist movement in China had a mainly military character, such as the revolt of the Riff-inhabitants [2], which at present under Abd-el-Krim manifests itself mainly as military resistance. As in China the capitalist system penetrated deeper, thus developing a significant industry in several areas in this large country, the proletarians of these industrial areas have grown in significance in the struggle against the imperialism of various countries. In Indonesia a massive peasants’ and workers’ movement developed even before the World War.
Pretty good. I don’t think this is a question for Brainly though.
Answer:
First and foremost, tenants did not own land or the crops they grew in a sharecropping system. Tenants often were forced to hand their crops over to the landowner, who would sell the crops and share a small portion of the profits with the tenant. Secondly, tenants were at the mercy of the market. They often overproduced crops to try making a profit on their own, which contributed to overblown supplies and falling prices. Finally, tenants often struggled with failing crops, failing land, and poor weather. Faced with debt to their landowners, tenants would be pressured to overcome these challenges while sometimes making choices that made the problem worse.
Explanation:
