1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ddd [48]
3 years ago
9

Describe the differences between the Roman Empire and the kingdoms that successed in Western Europe

History
1 answer:
loris [4]3 years ago
5 0

Byzantium is Roman Empire. The term “byzantium” is coined by german historian in 16th century to delegitimize late Roman Empire because they were orthodox plus they wanted to legitimize “Holy Roman Empire” as the successors of Rome which they could never succeed.

Western and Eastern Roman Empires were never totally independent states. Roman Empire just got divided into 2 administrative divisions to simplify micromanagement since it was not easy to rule such vast lands from one capital.

Western half of Roman Empire got invaded easily, again there was no “Eastern Roman Empire” but simply Roman Empire lost its western half.

Holy Roman Empire is a joke by itself. It is actually “Confederate Kingdom of Pretty German Princely States” who wanted to claim legacy to Roman Empire but they could not. First of all, east-west schism, papal supremacy is non-roman, pope was simply Bishop of Rome. Pope crowning someone as Roman Emperor is ridiculous. Also even coronation is barbaric by means of Roman Empire. Why ?

1- Coronation is given power from a higher source. Roman Emperors would ascend to throne, not get coronated which would seem as an insult.

2- Roman Empire did not have a “crown”. Ornate headgears were deplorable, they were simply random hats of emperors, power was by emperor, not the crown. Culture of coronation comes from Roman Emperor sending crown to his vassals, it is a diplomatic insult that said that headgear hold the power that emperor could grant to anyone he wanted.

Again, Emperors of Holy Roman Empire were not called Emperor or Roman or Holy by anyone pretty much, hence famous Voltaire quote “neither Holy nor Roman nor an Empire”.

Summary:

Western Roman Empire and Byzantium (Eastern Roman Empire) were both Roman Empire, they were not independent states but two administrative divisions of the same empire, one of these divisions got destroyed early on, leaving the other one and only sovereign of Roman Empire.

Holy Roman Empire was Confederate Kingdom of German Princely States with elective monarchy where Habsburg dynasty of Austria bribed electors all the time.

You might be interested in
How did France change under Napoleons rule?
melamori03 [73]
C) That was a great problem for that time. The French revolution was supporting more power to for the common people but an absolute ruler took over the government eventually. People who put their faith into this new idea got very angry. Fun fact: the musician Ludwig van Beethoven who was a great supporter of this new idea wrote the 3rd symphony I think out of anger because Napoleon became Emperor
5 0
3 years ago
Why is filial piety the “source of all virtues” in Confucianism?
lord [1]

Answer: Confucius believed it is the model for the other four relationships.

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
Who brought an official end to the american revolution
Nataly_w [17]

Answer:  George Washington had brought the revolution to an end.  He was the first president and was a general of the army.

7 0
3 years ago
The "New South" was created after Reconstruction, and was influenced by a variety of individuals, groups, and events. Which stat
HACTEHA [7]
The correct option is B.
The Bourbon Triumvirate refers to three of the Georgia's most powerful politicians of the post reconstruction era. The three politicians are: Joseph Brown, Alfred Colquitt and John Gordon. The major goals of the three politicians was to preserve the old ways of the south while industrializing the south to be more industrialized like the north. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the reign of ____________ the predominant style was baroque. German peasants Louis XV Napoleon Louis XIV
bezimeni [28]

There are different kinds of leadership. During the reign of  Louis XIV the predominant style was baroque.

<h3>What is Louis XIV and the Baroque style about?</h3>

In the Art and State of France, under the rulership of Louis XIV, there was a sought of absolute monarchy where all power resided with the king.

Versailles was known to have reinforced the image of the Sun King and uses the Baroque style with other elements, that acts as a visual linkage to Louis' rule and to the power of Imperial Rome.

Learn more about Reign from

brainly.com/question/1475749

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What helped spread knowledge and ideas in eighteenth century colonial cities?
    12·2 answers
  • Which best explains how the economy affected politics in the United States in the 1930s?
    10·2 answers
  • How many electoral votes does a confidante need in order to win presidential election
    9·1 answer
  • Which socioeconomic system was gradually replaced by the growth of towns and cities during the Romanesque period?
    7·1 answer
  • What type of homes did the Ute’s live in?
    11·2 answers
  • Which is a set of push and pull factors tied to immigration that are most directly related?
    10·2 answers
  • The Green Revolution occurred during the ________.
    13·2 answers
  • Who should decide what laws you have to follow
    11·1 answer
  • What reforms were implemented during the Tang and Song dynasties? 20 points!!! And brainiest
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the more important reason why there were problems in America during the 1920s:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!