Answer:
d. Lobbying offers benefits but must also be carefully monitored.
Explanation:
In the first part of the text, Senator Robert Byrd mentions the presence of lobbyists since the creation of Congress and then points out their benefits and significance when he states the following: "We could not adequately consider our work load without them. (...) They all have a service to fulfill." However, Bird also claims that they should be carefully monitored when he highlights "the need for eternal vigilance" of this group.
Because it provided a major step in the fight for freedom and they got an organized group together for the first time.
Answer:
sounds like Jacques Cousteau
Explanation:
Answer:
Masculine
Explanation:
Under communication skills, there are different type of communication styles that has a bearing on the individual gender or physical characteristics who is communicating. Within cultural institutions, there are different communication-styles between genders exist due to disagreements in the way information is conveyed and how it is received by the gender involved. It is a common knowledge that male adopt a masculine communication style by displaying certain competitive traits, are more authoritative, more mission focused, dominance and are focus more on performance, while female communication styles have a tendency to be more circular focused, more likely to think or react to situations based on emotions.
Therefore based on different communication styles found in males and females, the scenario where Thomas suggests a video-game contest to his sister and She says, "Bring it on, I'm gonna whoop you." shows a predominant trait associated with a male under communication skill by displaying certain competitive traits, a more authoritative, sort of egocentric dominance. Thomas sister communication style in this incident is Masculine communication style
Major shifts, that is shifts in the paradigms, are not very frequent - they would make scientific research unstable, as any result of a smaller study could be made invalid by a paradigm shift,
minor changes however are quite common - basically every scientific study adds to the common knowledge and this also can be considered a minor change.
Therefore the best answer is
<span>Major
shifts in scientific views very rarely occur, but minor modifications
of prior knowledge are continually made based on new research.</span>