I believe the correct answer is that they inspire consumer confidence which leads to increased purchases from producers
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
Lack of support networks becomes one of the most important factors in the acculturation process, but can also be one of the greatest sources of stress for immigrants and refugees.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are
immigrants?</h3>
A person who relocates to a different nation is considered to be an immigrant. An individual who migrates from her native Mexico to her new home in the United States is an example of an immigrant. A plant or animal that has only lately made its debut in a particular region for the very first time.
In conclusion, For immigrants and refugees, a lack of support networks may be one of the most significant aspects in the process of acculturation, but it can also be one of the most significant causes of stress for these groups.
Read more about immigrants
brainly.com/question/13688875
#SPJ1
In the early 1700s, the British government made a special deal with the East India Company, an English organization doing trade in the East Indies. They agreed that no other company was allowed to sell tea in Britain or its colonies.
I hope, this helped. Pls hit that thanks button C:
<span>The delegates knew that signing the Declaration was dangerous. Britain would call it treason. Treason is the crime of fighting against one's own government. Anyone who signed the Declaration could be charged with treason and hanged.
HOPE THIS HELPED ;)
</span>