In the past, learners were required to achieve at least 50% in four specific designated subjects that were the same nationwide. However, this was recently changed - the new requirements include attaining the same percentage in any four subjects that have 20 credits from a list of subjects.
This change has certain advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is that there will be more students with better percentages applying for various high education institutions as it should now be easier for them to pick subjects they are most confident in and that will be relevant for their further education. Their focus will also be on those most important subjects for them and their studies instead of on something they might not even need in their future career.
However, a disadvantage is that students might pick subjects they find easiest just to secure their place in a university. Those subjects ultimately might not provide them with needed strategies for thinking and learning that otherwise designated subjects might have. Furthermore, some higher education institutions might have their own lists of designated subjects and minimum entry requirements that might not be the same as the student's choices
Which of the following is an example of a molecule with different atoms?
Answer:
Hi, There! 
Here! your Answer Is Option B.
Also I See that This Question Is Under "Social Studies" Next time Make sure to Put it under the right Subject so they dont delete the Question :D
Hope this Helps!!
Answer: B.
The economy would produce if all prices, including nominal wages, were fully flexible
<span>DUI or also known as Driving Under the influence charge.
If this offense was your first time, the punishment would be administrative and
the outcome would be getting your license suspended. But license suspension is
an administrative action thus you can lose your license before being convicted
under a charge of DUI. Under criminal law, the second punishment would be
fines, prison or jail time sentencing, and parole. Therefore, the answer is true.</span>
Answer:
high-context; low-context
Explanation:
Audience members who place more importance on nonverbal than verbal messages from a speaker might be from high-context cultures.
People from high-context cultures have highly collectivistic beliefs. Here mutual respect and businesses are done by building up relationships with each other and maintains respectful communication. People from High context cultures belief in interpersonal relationships. They give more importance to non verbal communications in the form of body language and gestures, behaviors and character.
Whereas those placing more emphasis on what was said than the nonverbal messages might be from low-context cultures.
In low context cultures, a lot of information is exchange through direct talks and communication. People from low context cultures follow direct rules and maintains standards. They are task oriented and have short term relationship.
Thus the answer is "high-context" and "low-context".
