The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
1. Do you think that the business executive who made this statement would be in favor of or against free trade? What makes you think so?
What I think is that times are changing and are very different from the time of "Made in America."
In this modern-time, globalization rules, and free trade are the direct consequence of globalization. Many American companies have decided to go abroad and built fabrics and industrial plants in other countries because in those developing countries they pay low salaries and can get more profits selling their products. American companies have been greedy too.
2. What do you feel about the number of imported items you can buy in stores? How might free trade affect these numbers?
As I mentioned above, it is part of free trade in a globalized world. Yes, the United States imports many things, but let's remember that the US also exports many goods to other countries. So this is call balance, in which countries negotiate to have a balance in trade. Countries export, yes, but they also have to import goods, so all the countries win.
The best example is the free trade agreement called NAFTA, now USMCA, between México, Canada, and the United States.
B is the answer your right smart cookie
Answer:
C. a third variable, such as students' home environment, must have caused students to both drink more non-diet soda and engage in aggressive acts
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about An observational study that was conducted in inner-city Boston approximately four years ago demonstrated that high-school students who consumed more than five cans of non-diet soda every week were between 9 and 15-percent likelier to engage in an aggressive act compared with counterparts who drank less non- diet soda. In this case, we can reliably conclude that a third variable, such as students' home environment, must have caused students to both drink more non-diet soda and engage in aggressive acts.
Observational studies can be regarded as studies whereby
researchers make observation about different effect of factors such as
risk factor, home, as well as environment and diagnostic test that affects the experiment. In observational studies Variables are very crucial, A variable can be anything that that is liable to change, it can change and it can be changed as well. They are factors which the observer can manipulate or control for when carrying out experiments.
When testing a hypothesis using a null hypothesis, you use a statement that negates your hypothesis, and, within a certain level of certainty, see if the null hypothesis can be rejected. When testing the null hypothesis, you typically want to be around 95% sure that you can reject it (confidence interval is 95%).
In Rose's case, she is testing the hypothesis that there is a correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior.
Her null hypothesis would be:
"There is not a positive correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior"
or
"The correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior is less than or equal to zero"
