Answer:
Dear Mark,
Hope you are doing well. I wanted to inform you that I have finally shifted to Yakutsk, the coldest city in the world. The weather here is extreme and hard to tolerate. However, we are somehow defeating it in our own way.
Most of the neighborhood use electric heaters to keep themselves calm and hard winter clothes are always there. But i must say even after all such issues this place is beautiful in its own way. Hope to meet you soon, please make a visit when you are free.
Your friendly,
John
Since “loaded word” usually mean striking emotion I would say it is “mighty”
Answer:
Accord
Explanation:
Accord meaning "in agreement ". so accord would be the only answer
<span>Be thou as chaste as ice, as pure as snow, is the sentence which uses similes. Similes are figures of speech that compare one thing to another thing. In this sentence Shakespeare is comparing a person's character to ice that is as pure as snow. </span>
<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>
