The American colonists were justified in doing this simply because their colonies had become too big and too important to be treated as a colony by the British. The British should have given the colonies some autonomy, but they did not. The analogy I like to use is that of teens and their parents. Parents have to give teens more independence as they grow up. If they do not, the teens may justifiably rebel.
The British were not, on the whole, brutal or oppressive towards the colonists. However, they would not let the colonists have much in the way of self-rule. This had been fine when the colonies were still small and economically weak. By the 1760s and 1770s, however, the colonies were "teenagers." They were big and strong enough to expect some autonomy. When Britain reacted to requests for autonomy by being more strict, the colonists were justified in rebelling.
Answer:
The answer is A- Stephen Douglas's argument
Answer:
International: struggle for hegemony and Empire outstrips the fiscal resources of the state.
Political conflict: conflict between the Monarchy and the nobility over the “reform” of the tax system led to paralysis and bankruptcy.
Explanation:
hope this helps if so please brainliest
Merry Christmas
The correct answer is <u>C</u>. John Smith didn´t state that it was Christianization the main reason for the Britons to go to the Americas. He was an <em>explorer </em>who gained his adscription as a <em>pioneer of colonization</em> by piercing the unknown land of Virginia and New England. He focused on the description of the New World and how to exploit the resources within the conquered territories. In his writings, he clearly stated that the New World was harsh but with plenty of raw resources waiting to be exploited by hard workers.
