1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna1 [17]
3 years ago
5

Describe the tone of winston churchill’s first speech to the house of commons as prime minister of britain in may 1940 with two

adjectives and an adverb
History
2 answers:
Assoli18 [71]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

he was aslo a little sad

Explanation:

SOVA2 [1]3 years ago
3 0
<span>After realizing that the Munich Agreement had failed its purpose, Prime Minister Winston Churchill delivered an urgent and influential speech to the House of Commons, iterating the importance of standing up against the Nazi regime in order to curb their influence.</span>
You might be interested in
Which statements about the US Constitution express the views of a Democratic-Republican?
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

The US Constitution requires states to surrender their power to a strong national government.

The US Constitution should be interpreted loosely

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which best describes Genghis Khan? Group of answer choices As Emperor he enforced very brutal laws A brutal warrior All of these
irinina [24]

Answer:

un 6, 2019 — After uniting the nomadic tribes of the Mongolian plateau, he conquered ... of Genghis Khan's invasions, but he also granted religious freedom to his ... By 1205 he had vanquished all rivals, including his former best friend Jamuka. ... Khan's wars, in part because the Mongols propagated their vicious image ...

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What year was the Vietnam Veterans Memorial dedicated in Washington, D.C.?
timama [110]

Answer:

November 13, 1982

4 0
2 years ago
McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it
malfutka [58]

Answer:

applied the Second Amendment to state government.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What to thing do historians do to support or refute thesis statements ?
    13·2 answers
  • The beginning of the post world war ii "red scare" was signaled by
    6·1 answer
  • Modernized japan included all of the following except
    13·1 answer
  • What was the major difference between Charles X and Louis Philippe
    12·1 answer
  • How did Aztec society differ from Inca society?
    7·2 answers
  • 6. What technology did Johann Gutenberg invent? How did it change society?
    13·2 answers
  • What are three concepts that democratic governments promote and protect? (Site 1)
    5·2 answers
  • What challenge did the ancient Hebrew people face after migrating to Canaan?
    8·1 answer
  • When Was Russia's “Red October” Revolution?
    8·2 answers
  • Why do you think al biladuri wrote this document
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!