Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
The danger and difficulty in escaping from slavery are hard to imagine. Most slaves were illiterate and had no money and few, if any, possessions. The colour of their skin made them easy targets during the daylight for those who would hunt them down—often with the help of bloodhounds—and return them to their owners.
They became the largest country in the whole world
<h2>En muchas ocasiones he tenido que defender una idea, tanto en el colegio como con amigos y familiares, puesto que parte de tener una identidad es defender y debatir nuestras ideas
</h2><h2>
</h2><h2>
</h2><h2>La forma en que defendí mi idea fue la siguiente:
</h2><h2>
</h2><h2>Presenté mis ideas claras y concisas.
</h2><h2>Argumenté cada una de las bases de las mismas.
</h2><h2>Respondí las dudas generadas por la controversia.
</h2><h2>Escuché y pedí que me escucharan.
</h2><h2></h2>
