Answer:
The advice of Bise helped king PN Shah to successfully gather / collect adequate money for purchasing weapons for the unification-centric wars. It clearly shows that Bise was a non-paid advisor to the king PN Shah.
Hello there!
<span>When playing games of chance like slot machines or roulette, people often say that a particular outcome is "due," implying that one outcome is more likely because it hasn't happened in a while. this is a fallacy because in these examples the outcome of each trial is: Independent
Games or chance are random in nature. That is, the outcomes are influenced not by the previous outcome, but by probabilistic statistics. In slot machines or roulette, the outcome of each trial is Independent, meaning that it isn't influenced by any previous trial and that if an outcome doesn't happen in a while, it will not increase the chances that it will happen in the next trial.
</span>
Rodriguez compare his own attitudes towards reading to his parents' attitudes toward reading that they are not as intelligent as his teachers.
Paralleling the Rodriguez's education were the increasing contrary feelings Rodriguez was developing toward his parents. While he did not mean to be hurtful and rude towards them, he found that he was becoming angry when they did not seem to be with the same capabilities as his teachers have . Moreover as a student, Rodriguez looked toward his teachers, and not his parents, as the role models for him.
In this way he compared his own attitude as a scholarship boy with his parents.
To know more about Rodriguez here:
brainly.com/question/24393400
#SPJ4
Answer:
In the United States the president can neither declare nor fund a war without the vote of Congress.
Explanation:
If you were to read about a country whose government allows their president to declare war on another country, and individually coin money to fight the war without the consent of any other government official.
In the United States, the president can neither declare nor fund a war without the vote of Congress approving such.
Answer:
Lapses in part.
Explanation:
I don't know all the variables of the laws of inheritance, but I understand that the correct answer is that it fails in part.
The reason is that if Delsey left her will to her daughter Delsey while she was alive, she would be the rightful heir, but in the event that she had already died, the rightful heir would be Delsey's son and Char's grandson, Egor.
So Char's desire to leave the ranch to her daughter is not fulfilled for obvious reasons, but it is fulfilled in part because her son (and char's grandson) is the rightful heir.
