The level of quality of information would eventually exist in the market for lemons assuming there was no way to gain assurance regarding the accuracy of the information would be low only.
In the given scenario we are given that there is no way to reassure ourselves that the information is accurate about the lemons in the existing market.
So we can not be a hundred percent sure that the information regarding the lemons existing in the market is correct.
As a result, if there was no method to verify the authenticity of the information, only low-quality information would eventually be available in the market for lemons.
Learn more about the market:
brainly.com/question/25754149
#SPJ4
Answer:
B) adaptive
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that this form of expectations formation is known as adaptive expectations. These are expectations formed from a process in which individuals predict what will most likely occur in the future based on the data of what has already happened in the past.
Answer:
14.34%
Explanation:
To find the percentage of returned surveys over the total we divide and then multiply:
(717/5000)*100= 14.34%
The response rate appears to be low because it is less than 50% (which would be 2500 return surveys). Some statistical studies agree that 30 is the minimum number of observations a study must have, but this number does not ensure statistically significant results.
The problem with a very low response rate is that survey´s answers does not significant represent the study population characteristics and so we cannot make inferences, correlations or regressions that are statistically significant. In this case, the conclusions that scientists make about association between the left-handed population and right-handed population with the use of cell phone calls could be wrong or not represent the population characteristics, which means answers are not trustful.
Answer:
Management refers to the ability or art of setting objectives, organizing, motivating the people resources, devising systems of measurement, and building human capacity towards the attainment of all organization objectives.
Explanation:
1. Defining Objectives: This flows down from the Founder and Chief Vision Officer. The objectives of an organization is the purpose for which an organization was set up. An example could be to give people living with a disability the opportunity to live inclusively, attaining their highest selves.
2. Organizing: When objectives are taken and put in form of goals, these goals are devolved through to management in the form of achievable tasks who then delegate them to staff. The process of ensuring that each staff know their tasks, who they are accountable to, and work together harmoniously is called Organising.
3. Motivating team: It is not enough to have human resources. It is critical that they be willing to work together, harmoniously and happily. This way, the company enjoys the highest performance possible.
4. Defining Performance Indicators
What is not measured can not be managed. Performance Indicators are systems of measurement that enable the organization to keep track of whether or not the goals are being met and in what measure they are.
5. Building Capacity
Organizations that build leaders the fastest are the ones that win. Building human capacity is the equivalent of upgrading machinery or opting for higher manufacturing technology in the industrial age. People are able to solve problems to the extend that they know how to. The more they know, the better and faster they are at solving such problems. Hence, increasing organizational competency and effectiveness.
Cheers
Answer:
wearing a suit to a job interview: ethical wearing an expensive suit to impress others not ethical, wearing your best dress suit to a formal banquet ethical wearing a law enforcement uniform to gain respect not ethical, finally wearing a certain type of style clothes to fit in with the desired crowd not ethical hope this helps good luck!
