<span>The looser interpretation of the law created a multimember executive whereas the strict interpretation created a one-person executive.
This filling in of the blanks creates an appropriate and meaningful sentence. Laws may be open to various interpretations. If "person" was thought to be a singular physical person, that would give rise to a strict interpretation for the purposes of the law and a "one-person executive". Operational definitions are important, and "person" could be interpreted as an "entity" or a "collective" in which case the looser interpretation of a law would be at play to create the "multi-member executive".</span>
Answer:
b. $120,800.00
Explanation:
Cost of the land $ 600,000/-
Associated expenses:
Razing down the shed: $ 5000
income from scrap: $ 1000
Total expenses $ 4000
The total cost of land =600,000+4000= $ 604,000
Tax allocation: land and building $ 500,000
land allocation will be: 100,000/500,000 x$ 604,000
=0.2x604,000
=$120,800.00
Answer:
consequential damages
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bill can recover the 900 he lost from Carl as consequential damages. These are damages have happened because of one party's failure to meet a certain deadline or contractual obligation and can be proven in court. Therefore since Bill can prove that he lost the 900 because of Carl's negligence he will most likely win that case.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
is as request to access data from as database to manipulate it or retrieve it
Question:
For an economy starting at potential output, a decrease in autonomous expenditure in the short-run results in a(n):
A. increase in potential output
B. recessionary output gap
C. decrease in potential output
D. expansionary output gap
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
A decrease in autonomous expenditure shifts the Planned Aggregate Expenditure curve downward thus creating a lower equilibrium output.
PAE = C + Ip + G + NX
where
PAE = Planned Aggregate Expenditure
C = consumption
Ip = Investment Spending
G = Government Spending
NX = Net Export
If an economy has its output equal to its potential, this will create a reduction in short-run equilibrium output leading to a recessionary output gap.
Cheers!
