The answer is desire! I hope this helps!
I think it’s both, but probably leaning more towards ethos.
A is the answer because she's planning ahead and going to learn about the career that she is going to pursue.
Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.
Explanation:
In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.
Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.
They both show how these schools be prepare to be political social and economic issues