Answer:
Which type of change—political, social, or economic—had the most impact on Southern life? The economic change on the south was the most impactful on the south because the southerners had to adapt the most due to the change. They also hated people of color and found new ways to show racism. They had to find new ways to work and new ways to go about their daily life.
Which type of change—political, social, or economic—faced the most challenges? Why were Southerners against this type of change? Their most challenging type of change was social. The southerners were affected most by this change as they relied on slaves the most. They needed people to run their farms to make them money. They also didn't like colored people and would have to change how they treated people of color. They still ended up finding ways to be racists by building specific things for a specific race.
For the first hundred years of the United States, only white males were able to vote. Since then, amendments to the Constitution have made it so that any citizen aged 18 or older can vote. Which amendments granted different groups the right to vote? Why were amendments needed to expand voting rights? The amendments 15, 19, 23, 24, and 25 were granted to give any citizens the right to vote. These amendments were needed in order to move on to the next era of the American country. Also white males were very racist against anyone who wasn't white as they believed they deserved all the power because of the color of their skin.
Phones were made and steam engines and stuff like that
Answer:
what-? virus on this app-?
Answer:
Advantages
They have the ability to experiment freely with innovative approaches and, if necessary, to take risks.
They are flexible in adapting to local situations and responding to local needs and therefore able to develop integrated projects, as well as sectoral projects.
They enjoygood rapport with people and can render micro-assistance to very poor peope as they can identify those who are most in need and tailor assistance to their needs.
They have the ability to communicate at all levels, from the neighbourhood to the top levels of government.
They are able to recruit both experts and highly motivated staff with fewer restrictions than the government.
Disadvantages
Paternalistic attitudes restrict the degree of participation in programme/project design.
Restricted/constrained ways of apporach to a problem or area.
Redued replicability of an idea, due to non-representativeness of the project or selected area, relatively small project coverage, dependence on outside financial resources, etc.
"Territorial possessiveness" of an area or project reduces cooperation between agencies, seen as threatening or competitive.
Explanation:
Good example of appeasement being used is the Munich Conference (1938), and the Potsdam Conference (1945). Many see appeasement as surrendering to another country’s wishes, which can make a nation and its leader look weak. It’s a temporary measure taken to stop a war, but many times is unsuccessful in the long run. Leaders such as Neville Chamberlain and FDR used this strategy with Hitler and Stalin, who both took advantage of what they had been given. Appeasement can put a country in a weak position due to them losing territory, resources, etc. It’s a very diplomatic policy, but usually only curbs a threat for a short time. Hope this helped a little! :)
