Answer:
Miranda vs Arizona: Miranda rights were added to the 5th amendment, which is the constitutional requirement for any law enforcement to read your Miranda rights to you. "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you."
DC vs Heller: Landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
Marbury vs Madison: Established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same excerpt regarding popular sovereignty that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that in order for this to work, only the majority has to be satisfied--meaning that a large group of people (as big as 49.99%) will be ultimately unhappy. </span></span>
Dependent variable. the variable is dependent on the outcome
Absolutist governments in Europe were different because they believed in sovereignty.
This is the belief that the king holds all powers and abilities to rule.
Powers are not even given to the nobles or any of the assembly within the government.
