1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ohaa [14]
3 years ago
11

What are the job prospects for students with either a bachelor’s degree, master’s degree, or a doctoral degree in psychology?

Law
1 answer:
sweet [91]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

degree holders. Most graduates with a bachelor's degree in psychology find work in other fields such as business administration, sales, or education. However, they may be able to find work in the field of psychology as assistants to psychologists.Explanation:

You might be interested in
Do you think that a name is only a name? Or, do you feel that a name truly describes a person and has great meaning?
7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

i think a name is only a name

Explanation:

the thing that describes someone is her/his character and goodnature

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
In Engel v. Vitale, why did the courts rule that prayer in schools was unconstitutional?
weqwewe [10]
The prayer was considered a religious activity.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Chapter 1 covers various Schools of Legal Thought. 1) Pick two of the schools of thought and describe how each school of thought
Nat2105 [25]

Answer and Explanation:

Jusnaturalist School: According to this school, a law must, above all, directly address the promotion of justice in any type of situation, respecting the maximum natural right of the individual, which is an inalienable right that must be respected at any cost. . Based on this school, the situation shown in the question above is inadmissible, as it does not promote justice, it prevents innocent people from traveling via respecting their religion and still hurts their natural right.

Teleological School: This school has a strong political character and states that a law that achieves a social balance and promotes and is the service of protection and promotion of policies that protect society, it is valid. In relation to the case shown in the question above, this school can claim that the law is correct, since there have already been many cases of terrorism caused by Muslims, making their ban on boarding a promotion of social security.

2. When analyzing these two schools of legal thought in relation to the case shown in the question above, I came to the conclusion that the Jusnaturalist school is the one I most agree with. This is because prohibiting Muslim women from boarding an airplane because of terorist cases that they were not part of is a strong example of religious prejudice and intolerance, in addition to hurting the rights of innocent women.

7 0
2 years ago
Under the Driver Responsibility Program (DRP), a driver accumulates ___ points for every traffic conviction which does not resul
Bumek [7]

Answer:

2 points

Explanation:

The Driver Responsibility Program (DRP) was set up to help in managing the activities of road users; mainly drivers. Drivers who broke the traffic rules were made to face the wrath of the law.

It involves assigning points to the offenders according to their offences.

A driver accumulates 2 points for every traffic conviction which does not result in a crash which includes running the traffic light. The driver is also fined.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the formula for how much force is necessary to make a object accelerate
    8·1 answer
  • What are the ultimate purpose pf imposing criminal sanctions​
    11·1 answer
  • Geoff's fiancée, Susan, comes to meet his parents for the weekend. On Saturday morning, while using Geoff's mother's hair dryer,
    14·1 answer
  • In your opinion, does the government work the way it should? Is power shared equally or does one branch control more than its sh
    5·1 answer
  • A democratic government differs from a dictatorship in the way that it:
    9·1 answer
  • 1.The possession of blank is considered a separate felony by most jurisdictions in the United States
    13·2 answers
  • According to the segment, which of the following interviewing techniques is NOT recommended when interviewing juveniles?
    15·1 answer
  • Identify any FOUR<br>form of human nghts<br>​
    11·2 answers
  • Erin is a system administrator for a federal government agency. What law contains guidance on how she may operate a federal info
    7·1 answer
  • Why did rosa parks refuse to give her seat up
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!