Then licked some up on his tongue is dependent beacuse it can't stand alone
Answer:
We were at a disadvantage <em><u>in</u></em><em> </em>that that we weren't too familiar with the language the others were using.
Explanation:
In the given sentence, the correct preposition to be used is "in". This is because "in" will introduce the argument or provide an explanation for the statement before the blank.
With the use of "in", the statement <em>"we weren't too familiar with the language the others were using"</em> provides an explanation for the first statement <em>"[W]e were at a disadvantage"</em>. Whereas the use of the prepositions "by", "with", and "for" are incorrect.
Thus, the correct answer is "in".
I would say that it is the job of those who use the internet research ie such as authors to evaluate the credibility of the information gleaned from there and one way is to identify the source ie to verify it say a magazine that is a legitimate entity by calling it or say by asking someone one knows about the validity of the facts one has gathered to confirm them or at least part of them as a sample to test the validity of the whole information. Checking more than one source is a good idea too to corroborate information if much the same answer is obtained from say 2 or more sources it probably has more credibility.
One of the essential characteristics that must be taken into consideration when choosing a research topic is that it must not be too broad, and it should be narrowed as much as possible in order to be more specific to the subjects themselves. Therefore, the answer would be "<span>Record labels first rose to prominence in the mid-twentieth century and became the largest player in the music business; today, they have less importance in the industry."</span>
