1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
spayn [35]
3 years ago
8

Compare theodore roosevelt's big-stick foreign policy to william howard taft's dollar diplomacy.

History
1 answer:
weeeeeb [17]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Both were interventionist on their face: both types of foreign policy advocated going into nations and bending them to our wills. However, Taft also implemented the idea of giving loans to companies based in these countries as a way of forcing out European interests that were competing with the US at the time.</span>
You might be interested in
Shah Nowruz wants Iranians to follow strict Islamic law.<br> True<br> False
anzhelika [568]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Because it is you can trust me

5 0
2 years ago
What factors made China susceptible to Western imperialism and foreign influence?
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

Imperialism in China had a negative effect on both the economy and the well being of the chinese population through uprisings (public instability), opium, and trade disadvantages for the Chinese.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!! XDDD

8 0
3 years ago
2. When was Jesus crucified?
laila [671]

2.jesus was crusified the first century judea jerusalem

3.Simon of Cyrene

4.Joseph of Arimathea

5. JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS!

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Nazi policies prior to the beginning of the Holocaust sought to
laila [671]

Answer:

q

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Brinkmanship was a bold, aggressive idea because it required drastically decreasing defense spending. engaging in lengthy peace
Sedaia [141]

The reason for which Brinkmanship had been considered a bold, as well as, an aggressive idea would be:

<h3>What is Brinkmanship?</h3>

Brinkmanship is defined as the hunt towards a particular benefit by taking a risk instead of giving up. Brinkmanship is the practice of trying to achieve a profitable outcome by pushing dangerous events on the brink of an ongoing conflict.

This strategy is based on international politics, foreign policy, labor relations, modern military strategy, and high-profile cases.

The idea is considered an aggressive idea because it involves a greater and more dangerous level of risk i.e. "pretending an attack to take the enemy down.'

However, the idea is dangerous but it contains an advantage on the hand if it gets successful.

Thus, option C is the correct answer that is bluffing an enemy into thinking it would be attacked.

To learn more about  Brinkmanship, refer:

brainly.com/question/807188

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe how Sumer met the three criteria of a civilisation (Use specific examples)
    11·2 answers
  • Where did the United Nations meet? How many representatives met?
    8·2 answers
  • How did Europeans maintain a way of settling in the Caribbean?
    9·2 answers
  • Outline the reparations required of germany and describe the plan that was enacted to aid germany to fulfill their responsibilit
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the Missouri Compromise hard to accept for many legislators?
    15·1 answer
  • How did nationalist resistance movements change over time
    12·2 answers
  • Which three of the following statements accurately dipicts the events at the Battle of Normandy in 1945?
    13·1 answer
  • What were the two fronts called?
    8·1 answer
  • Ultimately Social contract theories are about
    11·1 answer
  • Please help i’m lost
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!