1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Thepotemich [5.8K]
3 years ago
10

in the 1850s why did harriet feel compelled to escort her escaped slaves all the way to st. catherine’s

History
1 answer:
mina [271]3 years ago
6 0
One reason was that the Fugitive Slave Law that was part of the compromise of 1850 changed everything.
You might be interested in
The events above all played a role in unraveling of the relationship between the colonists and great britain.Which event do you
Rom4ik [11]

Before the act of emancipation was approved in July 1776, the Thirteen Colonies and the Kingdom of Great Britain had been at war for more than a year. Relations between the two had deteriorated since 1763. The British Parliament enacted a series of measures to increase taxes in the colonies, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767. The Legislative Body considered that these regulations were a legitimate means for the colonies to pay a fair share for the costs of keeping them in the British Empire.

However, many settlers had developed a different concept of the empire. The colonies were not directly represented in the Parliament and the settlers argued that this legislative body had no right to assign taxes. This fiscal dispute was part of a greater divergence between the British and American interpretations of the Constitution of Great Britain and the scope of Parliament's authority in the colonies. The orthodox view of the British - dating back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 - argued that Parliament had supreme authority throughout the empire and, by extension, everything that Parliament did was constitutional. However, in the colonies the idea had developed that the British Constitution recognized certain fundamental rights that the government could not violate, not even Parliament. After the laws of Townshend, some essayists even began to question whether the Parliament had any legitimate jurisdiction in the colonies. Anticipating the creation of the Commonwealth of Nations, in 1774 the American literati - among them Samuel Adams, James Wilson and Thomas Jefferson - discussed whether the authority of Parliament was limited only to Great Britain and that the colonies -which had their own legislatures- they should relate to the rest of the empire solely because of their loyalty to the Crown.

8 0
3 years ago
Both Roosevelt and Wilson supported civil rights.<br><br> True<br><br> False
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
How do people in Mexico live in world of fear ​
SashulF [63]

Answer:

They do because Trump has put fear in them.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did women challenge the government
kari74 [83]

Answer:

Because girl rocks! (just kidding) Answer in explanation

Explanation:

During the 1850s, the women's rights movement gathered steam, but lost momentum when the Civil War began. ... In 1869, this faction formed a group called the National Woman Suffrage Association founded by Lucy Stone. They began to fight for a universal-suffrage amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

3 0
3 years ago
Which case would the Supreme Court hear through its original jurisdiction power? a state that sues another for violating interst
Dimas [21]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be A). a state that sues another for violating interstate trade

____________________________________________________

The case that the Supreme Court would hear through its original jurisdiction power is a state that sues another for violating interstate trade.

____________________________________________________

Definitions:

Jurisdiction power:

Jurisdiction power is the power for the jury to hear a case for the first time, this means that the court is the first to hear about the case.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why answer choice "A).  a state that sues another for violating interstate trad" is the correct answer because this is a big case that needs to be sent to the Supreme Court as soon as possible.

This is a cause that wouldn't be seen first by the lower courts, or courts that are below the ranking of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court would use its jurisdiction power to hear this case first. A state suing another state involves the government, since they're the ones that have the power to sue for the state. This case would pretty much involve the government, which the Supreme Court needs to make sure that it could be solved as soon as possible. Interstate trade is pretty much known as trades that are from one state to another state, and in the answer, it's saying that a state is suing another state for violating state to state trading. Trading is very important in the U.S, and it's more important to get trades from other fellow states, if there is a problem between the states, it needs to be focused on to reduce the tension of hatred.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect:

The reason why answer choice "B). a man convicted of a crime based on false evidence " is incorrect because:

This is the type of case that would first be seen by the lower courts, and doesn't need to Supreme Court to be involved, since this is a case that would happy in a local community. The community court will deal with this case first. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

The reason why answer choice "C). a teacher prohibited from praying in a school cafeteria" is incorrect because:

This is another case that would be first seen the the lower court, or local court. This is also a case that doesn't need the Supreme Court to be involved in. The lower court will deal with these types of cases, since it's not ideal to the whole country. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

The reason why answer choice "D). a reporter whose First Amendment rights are violated" is incorrect because:

This is also another case that would first be seen the the lower courts. If someone's amendment rights were violated, then they would see a local court. They wouldn't see the Supreme Court be cause the Supreme Court wouldn't want to deal with a case like this, since it's not their job to deal with a case like that, that's the job for the lower courts. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

If you see the trend, all of the answer choices are wrong because they do not need the involvement of the Supreme Court for the case. Those types of cases should be dealt with the lower courts; they're the ones that are suppose to see this case first.

____________________________________________________

<em>-Julie</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why were the members of the Third Estate dissatisfied with their way of life under the Old Regime?
    11·1 answer
  • What was France before the french reveloution
    14·1 answer
  • All things considered, England and France decided not to assist the South during the Civil War for what two primary reasons?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT an event of the Cold War? (15 points) ( ASAP Please :) )
    5·1 answer
  • Revenue is the amount of money that
    14·2 answers
  • Which best describes Theodore Roosevelt’s impact on the election of 1912?
    7·2 answers
  • What did the British and French mandates in the Middle East have in common?
    14·2 answers
  • The Five Pillars of Islam are faith, prayer, fasting during Ramadan, charity, and:
    9·1 answer
  • Which organism is a carnivore? giraffe elephant lion bear
    5·2 answers
  • What was one lasting contribution of the Roman Empire
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!