1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vodka [1.7K]
3 years ago
10

Why did Nikita Krushchev want the western zones of Berlin under control of East Germany?

History
2 answers:
Molodets [167]3 years ago
7 0

Khrushchev wanted to control all of Berlin because it was an island of capitalism in the sea of communist East Germany, and because, ideologically he believed that ALL of Germany should become Marxist.

GuDViN [60]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is the following.

Nikita Kruschev wanted the Western zones of Berlin under control of East Germany because he did not accept the creation of a West Germany state. Originally, after World War II, the Soviet Union had the Eastern part of Berlin. But Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev ordered the blockade of all highways, to and from West Berlin in the night of August 12, 1961. Then he ordered the construction of a six-foot-high Berlin Wall.  

You might be interested in
Which philosopher believed that people were inherently evil and that government should control them?
Inessa05 [86]

Explanation:

In 1651, Thomas Hobbes famously wrote that life in the state of nature – that is, our natural condition outside the authority of a political state – is ‘solitary, poore, nasty brutish, and short.’ Just over a century later, Jean-Jacques Rousseau countered that human nature is essentially good, and that we could have lived peaceful and happy lives well before the development of anything like the modern state. At first glance, then, Hobbes and Rousseau represent opposing poles in answer to one of the age-old questions of human nature: are we naturally good or evil? In fact, their actual positions are both more complicated and interesting than this stark dichotomy suggests. But why, if at all, should we even think about human nature in these terms, and what can returning to this philosophical debate tell us about how to evaluate the political world we inhabit today?

The question of whether humans are inherently good or evil might seem like a throwback to theological controversies about Original Sin, perhaps one that serious philosophers should leave aside. After all, humans are complex creatures capable of both good and evil. To come down unequivocally on one side of this debate might seem rather naïve, the mark of someone who has failed to grasp the messy reality of the human condition. Maybe so. But what Hobbes and Rousseau saw very clearly is that our judgements about the societies in which we live are greatly shaped by underlying visions of human nature and the political possibilities that these visions entail.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the US economy different from European economies following world war 1
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

The answer is The U.S. economy grew at a much more rapid rate.

Explanation:

BRIANLIST PLEASE :}

6 0
2 years ago
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Tresset [83]

Answer:

decide if an action is constitutional

7 0
3 years ago
What impact did colonial governments have on american politics and institutions?
oee [108]

<u>The colonial governments had impact on american politics and institutions, through the following facts:</u>

<u>1. The idea of a common central government became increasingly popular</u> as criticism of British centralism took a violent form. The settlers' original dream of reforming old institutions and establishing a new civilization was unique and dual.

<u>2. The War of Independence was the first modern political revolution.</u> It started with the universal democratic slogan: "no taxation without representation".

<u>3. The Declaration of Independence in 1776 represented a revolutionary vision of mankind and its institutions</u>, emphasizing the natural necessity of separation and independence.

<u>4.  The Constitution, based on a federal model, established a prototype of interstate relationships according to the principle of divided sovereignty,</u> setting up a republican system in which no branch of the government could exercise any despotic authority over the others.

8 0
3 years ago
What do we call the study of human life and culture?
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

Anthropology

Explanation:

Anthropology is the study of humanity and society.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is studying human-environment interaction necessary to understand the economic geography of the Arabian Peninsula in t
    10·1 answer
  • What is calligraphy
    15·2 answers
  • The colonies relied on britain in the early 1600s to protect them? true or false​
    11·1 answer
  • Why is Somalia the poorest country in Africa
    13·1 answer
  • If 3/4 lb of candy cost 12.00 how much would each lb of candy cost
    5·2 answers
  • What do globalization,immigration and migration have in common
    13·1 answer
  • How did John Adams and Thomas Jefferson differ in their beliefs?
    15·1 answer
  • Who helped Ottoman rulers run their society when the empire was getting started
    10·1 answer
  • Place them in order…………………..
    9·1 answer
  • An example of a pull factor would be<br> oppression.<br> famine.<br> war.<br> safety.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!