A deductive argument is one that the arguer wants to be deductively valid, that really is, to provide a guarantee that the conclusion is correct if the premises are correct.
This principle may alternatively be put as follows: in a deductive argument, the premises are designed to give such strong evidence for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be wrong. A valid (deductively) argument is one in which the premises successfully ensure the conclusion. If a valid argument has true premises, it is also said to be sound. All arguments are either valid or invalid, and either sound or unsound; there is no such thing as being partially valid.
Therefore, the answer is deductive argument.
To know more about deductive argument click here:
brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
Based on historical context, the statement about anthropologists studying sexuality as features of anthropology before World War II are the following:
- Human sexuality was considered to be a fundamental aspect of the culture and was included in various customs.
- Anthropologists like Margaret Mead researched sexuality among young people in the western Pacific.
However, the statement about Anthropologists studying sexuality as a feature of anthropology after World War II is the following:
- Anthropologists no longer focused on sexuality customs that centers on marriage, relatives, and family.
- Anthropologists started researching sexuality issues such as gay, lesbian, and queer life, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that anthropologists studied different characteristics of sexuality before and after World War II.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/1799013
<span>using you messages to blame the other person,
interrupting,
making fun of the other person's feelings,
criticizing,
always wanting your own way,
and yelling</span>
At first the English sailor went to catch fish in the Grand Bank but then they went to capture Spanish ships.
