Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
Reducing risk
Explanation:
The two ways by which risk can be managed are;
✓ Risk avoidance
✓ risk reduction
risk reduction are activities needed to bring about lower likelihood of risk as well as severity of loss. We can reduce risk through reduction of allocation of our resources to risky situation. An example of reducing risk is in the instance of Financial markets that are making the process of borrowing large amounts of money easier because they simplify the negotiation process between borrowers and lenders.
Answer:
Which of the following is most likely to be true?
A
Explanation:
A) It will be difficult to find a rent-controlled apartment in Albany or Halftrack; rents for the Halftrack apartments not subject to controls will be higher than they would be without rent control
Answer:
d. This cannot be determined from the given information
Explanation:
To find the average revenue of 200 units it is necessary to know the total units. However, the function of the marginal revenue is not given. It is impossible to infer the marginal revenue (price) of other units (of output) only from knowing the marginal revenue of the 100th unit.
Answer:
A good marketing tactic for reaching cold prospects is Advertising
Explanation:
A cold prospect is a qualified potential customer that has little or no knowledge about your goods and service or about your company. to make them know about you can reach them through target advertising because you don't have their personal contacts yet to do them a personalized email or calls.
