Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
Answer:
EAC of Machine A is $6,788.64
EAC of Machine B is $6,094.62
We should purchase Machine B because of its ]lower EAC
Explanation:
Equivalent Annual Cost (EAC) = (Asset price x discount rate)/(1-(1+discount rate)^(-n))), in which n is the number of year for usage of asset.
EAC of Machine A is $6,788.64 = ($15,500x15%)/(1-(1+15%)^(-3))
EAC of Machine B is $6,094.62 = ($17,400x15%)/(1-(1+15%)^(-4))
Answer:
Carried over at the fair value that exists on date of transfer.
Explanation:
When the investor's level of influence changes, it may be necessary to change to the equity method from another method. When the level of ownership rises from less than 20% to a range of 20% to 50%, the equity method typically would become appropriate and the investment account balance should be carried over at the fair value that exists on date of transfer.
