Analyzing the text, it helps the reader identify the authors choices.
I’m not too good in english but i’m pretty sure the answer is polite.
The paragraph contains categories of comparison.
From the beginning of the text, the text starts to compare the family dinner to protests, the point of the text is that by comparing the family dinner to the protests, they are bith the same because one must give up one thing for the right kf the people, just as it states in this sentence from the text "One person has to give up a right for the good of the group"