To be really honest, I think its a matter of opinion on which sentence is the strongest conclusion. To me, I think choice C is the best answer because it paints the contrast between the dog's wild instincts versus loyalty. I guess the conclusion should also mention that despite the abuse, Buck still learned to trust a human (even though one could easily understand why the dog would never trust a human after the abuse), so it shows just how powerful loyalty can be.
I disagree of open book tests being harder than traditional tests; what is open book tests to you? <em>On every answer do you get to cheat to use your book? </em>I disagree, because on the final tests <em>or the STAAR tests, </em>you won't be using <u>open book.</u> What will you do then, if you only use open book? Traditional tests you won't have any book, not one. What will you do then, if you switched from always open books to a normal, better traditional test? <u>Students need to be more prepared; schools can't </u><em><u>let</u></em><u> them cheat. Open book tests are just something the teachers give to their students to make it easier.</u> This is why I believe open book tests are much <em>easier </em> than traditional tests, that is why I fully disagree when you say that Open Book tests are harder than traditional test.
Can I have brainliest or no
Because it is someone's memory that they are explaining it's told from their past or lifetime
Answer:
im srry people are being mean to you, i hope your doing ok. have a good day m8 :)
Explanation:
The first question i would say C or D but i think C is more correct
2nd question i would say it is D)
in the first question
We can conclude that the fast food could be as dangerous as drugs
That was on the D) option, but if you choose the C option, in one experiment with the rats, they survived 2 weeks without eating healthy food, they wanted the other food(not the healthy one)
In the other question i choose D because is asking "what evidence supports the claim that junk food could be addictive and the D) explains that the rats were given unlimited access to junk food and they did not measure the quantity of food they ate