The answer is<u> "D. Marquis de Lafayette".</u>
Lafayette initially served as an assistant to General George Washington. The two men got along well and turned out to be great companions. Subsequent to battling valiantly at the Battle of Brandywine Creek, Washington elevated Lafayette to handle officer. Lafayette performed well as officer. He likewise pushed for France to align with the United States.
After the French marked a settlement with the United States, Lafayette came back to France to persuade the King to give more troops. He was gotten as a legend in France. He at that point came back to America to proceed with his direction under Washington. He drove troops in a few fights including the last triumph at Yorktown. He at that point came back to France where he was elevated to real broad in the French armed force.
Answer:
<u>c. Temporal Lobe</u>
Explanation:
Temporal lobe: The term "temporal lobe" is described as one of different lobes of an individual's brain and is associated with the cerebral cortex. Temporal lobe is considered as the lower lobe of the cerebral cortex, and it is embedded close to the "ear level" within the skull. It is mainly responsible for preserving and creating both long-term and conscious memory.
<u>Dr. Michael Persinger </u>was an American professor of "psychology" who studied various phenomenon including spiritual experiences, consciousness, etc.
<u>In the question above, the correct answer is option-c.</u>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can comment on the following.
The Executive Office of the President is important to the President of the United States because it supports and advises the president.
Some journalists and historians think that the Executive Office of the President increases the size and power of the presidency. This is a legitimate observation in that is questioning the powers that the President has had in recent years to make decisions and sometimes to override decisions emanated from Congress.
The President of the US has so much power. He is the leader of the nation, the chief of the Cabinet, the chief diplomat of the US, and the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces.
1. This is a matter of constitutional law, as the reporter is defending her rights as a citizen stated by the Constitution (in this case, her freedom of expression).
2. It is a combination. On the one hand, the case will involve studying the constitution, and what it has to say about the reporter's freedoms. On the other hand, it will require studying the statute that argues that news agencies cannot publish information that can threaten the nation. Finally, case law will likely be relevant if there is a similar precedent in the law.
3. The law that the federal government is presenting is intended to protect the citizen's from threatening information. On the other hand, the law that the reporter is referring to is intended to protect her freedom of expression.
4. If the law to protect citizen's from information did not exist, it could be an obstacle for the effective action of the government. It could also cause panic and animosity among the people. If the law the reporter is defending did not exist, the government would be able to control the press completely.
