I think that would be Voting, though I am not positively sure.
Answer:
If President Lincoln hadn't been assassinated, I believe that Reconstruction and the post-war era would have been more historically positive and ambitious. I think Lincoln would have achieved more things politically and socially for America, and would have done more to fight against many injustices in this country. Andrew Johnson did not have a positive presidency, says his impeachment. Lincoln had plans, but Andrew Johnson created policies and actions that went against the Republican Party and angered many, like his pardoning of Southerners. Lincoln would have continued to be a great figure for his party and I believe would have provided more as leadership than Johnson. If he was not assassinated, I believe that Lincoln would have continued his legacy and his fight for justice in America.
The romans had a government that included both a body of senators and an emperor, much like today’s president and legislative branch. However they also allowed the people to have a say in government, which reflects the U.S. principle of “We the people.”
They use the separation goal
This means that they live separated from the mainstream communities and live in close knit small societies. Usually many of them never leave their societies and are not familiar with contemporary life styles outside of their communities.
