Answer:
The price of the cereal would fall.
Explanation:
In Economics, there are primarily two (2) factors which affect the availability and the price at which goods and services are sold or provided, these are demand and supply.
The law of demand states that, the higher the demand for goods and services, the higher the price it would be sold all things being equal. On the other hand, law of supply states that the higher the price of goods and services, the lower the supply.
When there is a surplus of a new brand of cereal in the market. What will likely happen to the price of the cereal is that the its price would fall.
Answer:C=Negative impact on customer relationships and satisfaction
Explanation:Xsis Inc being an IT and services company outsourced it's technical support calls to a company in Asia,this is called offshoring i.e outsourcing to a foreign company.the main issue is that this area is one if the core competence of an IT and service company and should not have been outsourced without proper monitoring of the service level agreements.outsourcing the call support means Xsis Inc will have to depend on the management,technical skills if the vendor to manage a very crucial aspect of their operation and from the above illustration,the vendors technical strength was poor leading to inability if customer's to reach senior technicians when the need arises ,this led to customer dissatisfaction ,which will off course lead to loss of patronage .
Offshoring as in this case had language barrier as a major obstacle ,the south east Asia vendors did not put enough infrastructure in place to cater for the customer's varying language need ,this led to customer's dissatisfactionand sorely affects the customer relationship with Xsis Inc,because the customer sees the call support vendor as staff of Xsis and may not be aware of the outsourcing deal and even if aware really don't care ,the connection is Xsis,the blame goes to Xsis and it is only rational for Xsis to cancel the contract and if possible insource this important function.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include any reference to know what you are talking about. You did not attach a text, chapter, or link to know about the story you are referring to. Even some context would have helped.
Without that information, we do not know what you are talking about. What is the scene? It could be about anything.
However, trying to help, we did some deep research and it seems you are referring to the scene of two military leaders. One is a Lt. Commander, and the other is a Captain. If this is the case, then we can comment on the following.
Based on the scene, my insights about influence tactics is that there are different leadership styles that should be used according to the moment, the people, and the urgency of the situation. Not all are valid per se. Some work best than others if the leader knows what, when, and how to apply its leadership style.
Officer Hunter was used to discerning information and ask questions before following an order. On the other hand, officer Ramsey simply followed orders and never asked why. Both tried to accomplish the same but using different approaches.
Answer:
1. Reduced cycle time: reduced process time in different areas.
2. Increased visibility: real-time status or availability of any process or product.
3. Increased efficiency: faster execution of each process.
4. Better quality: high quality standards of products and processes.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Sheila and her team were able to successfully implement an IS in a hospitality organization; increased visibility, increased efficiency, better quality and reduced cycle time.
Answer:
Explanation:
Fixed cost per month Variable cost per well Revenue $4,700 Salaries and Wages $41,300 $1,000 Service Materials $600 Other Expenses $40,200 When the company prepared its planning budget at the beginning of May, it assumed that 29 wells would have been serviced. However, 31 wells were actually serviced during May. Prepare the Planning Budget, Flexible Budget and variance analysis for Cosden Corporation.
<u> Planning Budget Flexible budget variance- Fav/(Unfav)
</u>
Revenue 4700*29 4700*31 9400
= 136300 = 145700
Less:
Salaries and wages 41300+1000*29 41300+1000*31 (2000)
= 70300 = 72300
Service material 600*29 = 17400 600*31 = 18600 (1200)
Other expense 40200 40200 0
Profit 8400 14600 6200
