it ensured that careers would be open on the basis of merit and not privileges of birth.
It did not guarantee women equal rights but confirmed the existing supremacy of men over women; women had fewer rights than children.
It didn't either enshrine individual rights or the security of the state- there was a balance
Answer:
Those who examine the impact of the Holocaust on politics deal with the extent, depth, type, and dynamics of the impact but not with the impact itself. The impact itself is considered axiomatic because it is so sweeping and vast. Since the issue is so large and made up of so many overt and covert associations - direct and indirect, Jewish and pan-human, immediate and belated, ethical and practical - a general framework that presents and diagnoses the matter becomes, by nature, a telegraphic prologue to innumerable studies already carried out and yet to come.
Explanation:
That statement is false
On federal level elections, third party politicians will contend for votes that failed to outpoll the two other parties
hope this helps
Hello! I believe the answer is the last one. Supported democratic South Korea against communist backed North Korea. Hope this helps!
France would have been a monarchy country but would be terrible kings and queens such as lui the 14 and queen Elizabeth
