Answer:
Likely due to confounding.
Explanation:
This outcome can most likely be explained as a consequence of confounding. Confounding refers to a distortion in the measure of association between two variables. This inaccuracy is the consequence of the variable of interest being mixed up with another factor that played a role in the result. In this example, this means that there might be another variable at play that causes this association between eating fruits and vegetables and the risk of developing colon cancer.
Natural monopolies and the reason to exist in the free market system
Explanation:
In a natural monopoly when a market can supply goods or the cost of the goods can be lowered in competition with the potential competitor then it is called as natural monopoly. In a market when the first supplier of the product is demanding more cost or raises the costs of the product then it eventually rises to natural monopoly.
Here the products are given at a lower rate than the capital supplier. They are available in free market because people always tend to go for lower prices and for a good quality product.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The undercover agent was able to recognize the car in two different locations because she demonstrated object permanency which is also known as object constancy. She was able to acknowledge the fact that objects remain in existence even when they don't trigger our senses such as sight, hearing, touch and smell.
Answer:
- Back stage.
Explanation:
As per the given description, Amanda would be considered in the 'backstage' as per Erving Goffman, the famous social psychologist. He described 'backstage' behavior as the behavior when there's no audience available to judge their behavior and individuals are completely liberated to reflect their 'true selves' without any kind of inhibition. Therefore, <u>the 'informal chat' and discussion about the new clients between the secretary and Amanda reflect that she(Amanda) is in 'backstage' as she is not inhibiting her 'true self' without any restriction and not 'casting off' anything.</u>
The correct answer would be, The label has caused her to have lower expectations and apply different treatments
The above mentioned statement is exemplified by the teacher's action.
Explanation:
Intellectual Disability is a disability related to brain functioning. The reasoning, functioning and problem solving are affected directly by this disability.
Children with such disability need more attention at their schools while doing their school tasks. When such students are being labelled as disabled, then the teachers who are teaching that student would have lower expectations from that student and they would definitely have a different treatment with that student than others.
This type of teacher's behavior towards a labeled student can cause more complications.
Learn more about Intellectual Disability at:
brainly.com/question/9220364
#LearnWithBrainly
