1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luda [366]
3 years ago
8

Which of these excerpts from "Once in a Lifetime" by Jhumpa Lahiri most clearly exemplifies diversity within socioeconomic statu

s?
History
2 answers:
Sindrei [870]3 years ago
6 0
Option c, i had to answer this question earlier
NARA [144]3 years ago
5 0
Option C is the answer
You might be interested in
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Whose sole function is to provide humanitarian aid around the world?
NikAS [45]
The United Nations' sole function is to provide humanitarian aid around the world.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many states are there in the united states?
Sladkaya [172]
There are 50 states in the United States of America
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the central ideological conflict of the Cold War?
Andrej [43]

Answer:

The central ideological conflict of the Cold War was over communism and capitalism.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Hunter gatherers were people who
yan [13]
The vast majority of them were people ... primarily men ... who hunted and gathered stuff to eat.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following types of commerce could the federal government regulate?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of following statements does not describe the growth of cities in the late 1800s?
    9·2 answers
  • What factor contributed to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II? (2 points)
    5·2 answers
  • What was the primary way that the economy in the South differed from the economy of the North?
    9·1 answer
  • Which President was blamed for the Great Depression?
    12·2 answers
  • Did Native Americans benefit from the French and Indian War?
    7·1 answer
  • How did Boris yeltsin become the president of Russia
    10·2 answers
  • 21 points! Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition:
    15·2 answers
  • The image on the right depicts three American Indian warriors who fought in the War of 1812. There is a British flag behind them
    6·2 answers
  • What injustices did American workers face in the last decades of the 1800s?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!