All categories

4 years ago

BRAINLIEST ASAP!!! 99 POINTS!!! PLEASE HURRY!!!

2 answers:

8 0

The checks and balances keep every branch of the govt. from victimization their job to induce too powerful. the perspective of Federalists on ratifying the Constitution is that a powerful national government is required to shield voters from threats, which the Constitution ought to be sanctioned like a shot to stop injury. the perspective of Anti-federalists on ratifying the Constitution is that the Constitution doesn't give enough protection for people's rights, which there's Not enough protection for powers of state governments.

Artemon [7]4 years ago

3 0

From the start of US history, the people have been keen on being able to control the government. This led to the Founding Fathers of the US to create the US Constitution, a document that shaped the US culture, and built the foundation of the country. However, even with the Constitution, the founding fathers though of a problem.

As seen inside the creation of the government, the Founding Fathers decided to create a government that was fairly different from the British Government, giving the people most of the power. This can be seen in our everyday lives, as people have the right to elect, petition, recall, and influence the government in many other ways.

However, the Constitution can only provide so much protection. In a evolving world, we see that there are new technologies, which creates a totally different atmosphere from the one our founding fathers had. We see the creation of weapons and technology currently not known to the Founding Fathers, leading us to ask the question: "Does the system imposed during the Colonial Age still can be used in today's society?" Over 200 years has passed since the creation of the Constitution, and people wonder if we can still use age-old beliefs in today's society. As people struggle in keeping or changing the constitution, we must look towards higher commands to continue it's protection.

This brings a final question. Is the protection of one's right an infringment of another? As stated in the First Amendment ofThe Bill of Rights, we have the "right to free expression and free association... the government does not have the right to forbid us from saying... [or] writing what we like;..." We must first look at history. As seen through historical Supreme Court rulings, the rulings waver in between what is allowed or not. For example, in "Yates v. United States (1957)", free speech, expression of opinion, and advocacy of action for radical beliefs were "upheld, unless it posed a clear and present danger". Another example can be seen at "National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie". Inside this ruling, we see that the Nazi Party wanted to host a rally near a Jewish village in Skokie, prompting the citizens of Skokie to file complaint. However, the Supreme Court denied the Supreme Court of Illinois's ruling, in that the previous ruling did not give equal rights to all people, the Nazi Party including. This shows that the Constitution does provide enough and equal protection, for the Supreme Court ruled that the Nazi Party of America was also protected under the 1st Amendment.

Through these examples, we see how:

1) Checks and Balances allow a balance of power, and allows the people of the US to have constant power over the government

and

2) The Constitution works to protect each and every one of us, regardless of our beliefs.

Without the Constitution (as well as the rulings of later courts), we would not have our rights, as well as the upholding of the rights today.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

hope this helps

You might be interested in

During the fall of European colonialism in the 20th century, new boundaries were established for states in Africa and Asia.

Alecsey [184]

Answer:

A physical boundary is a naturally occurring divide between two areas. Unlike things like politically-drawn state lines, boundaries are not man made. Instead, they are part of nature. A great example of a physical boundary is a mountain. For example, the Pyrenees Mountains, which serve to separate France and Spain, are a physical boundary; so are the Ural Mountains which separate Europe and Asia.

Explanation:

Moving away from physical boundaries, we now come to cultural boundaries. Also called an ethnographic boundary, a cultural boundary is a boundary line that runs along differences in ethnicity, such as language and religion.

Ex : The border between Ontario and Quebec is a cultural boundary between English and French.

B. French Guiana. A small territory bordering Brazil and Suriname that is still under French control, and is treated like a part of France despite being very colonial in nature. French Guianese creole is the most widely spoken language, yet people who only speak that language are at a major disadvantage. The French focused education in a nation where creole is widely spoken has lead to French Guiana to have "an unusually high rate of educational failure; it is the highest in all of France including all overseas’ departments and territories. "

Another place of interest is Kenya. Like many countries in Africa, there are dozens of commonly spoken Bantu languages. Despite this Swahili and English are the only official languages, and thus the man languages in regards to education. In many ways Kenya still retains much of its colonial style education. Opportunities for indigenous people are limited by the fact that Swahili and english are taught up until the 5th grade, but everything past that English is the language of instruction. This creates a vicious cycle of a poorly educated populace with many people not even making it to secondary school

In the colonial period, the area that now comprises the modern day state of Cameroon, was split between British and French control. When the time for independence came, there was conflict and controversy over whether or not British Cameroon should become apart of Nigeria or the newly independent from France Cameroon. This has lead to a tenuous situation today, where the west is mostly made up of Anglophones and the east, the majority of the population, Francophones.

5 0

3 years ago

Who was the 8th president?

Ganezh [65]

The 8th president of the United States was Martin van Buren, of Dutch descent, from the democratic party, who was also the first president born a United States citizen.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

From what did the British Army provide protection for the Americans

Nutka1998 [239]

The history of the British Army spans over three and a half centuries since its founding in 1660 .... It did this by making the standing army conditional on an annually renewed act of parliament. To this day .... For the British Army, the American War of Independence had its origins in the military occupation of Boston in 1768.

Hope it helps :)

4 0

3 years ago

how did the writing of enlightenment-era thinkers like John Locke and montesquieu influence th american revolution

laila [671]

the writings of the Enlightenment era thinkers like John Locke and montesquieu influenced the american revolution through discussing the concept of 'unalienable rights' or the rights that everyone should deserve and cannot be taken away. The idea of social contract also influenced the American Revolution.

6 0

3 years ago

Why did bigger states want a proportional representation

Bad White [126]

Answer:

Even though the states had more land size their population was less then states such as NY and MA. They didn't wan't the states with a bigger population to have more representation (which would equal more power)

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago