1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Licemer1 [7]
3 years ago
12

How did the nature of European exploration change by the seventeenth century?

History
1 answer:
zalisa [80]3 years ago
7 0
The main way in which the nature of European exploration changed by the seventeenth century was that by this time, the major European powers such as Spain and Portugal had claimed large amounts of territory in the New World, and already exporting large amounts of natural resources back to their homeland. 
You might be interested in
WORTH 100 PONITS <br> * what is slavery
Kruka [31]
The enslavement of african American taken from Africa
5 0
3 years ago
As you learned in the Cuba tutorial, thousands of people, young and old, are willing to risk their lives at the chance to make m
denis-greek [22]
I'd say the answer is, A) True. Hope this helped you.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After the Civil War, the southern economy
VLD [36.1K]
Was driven by livestock.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List the first four dynasties and the years of their rule.
sladkih [1.3K]

<u>The Major Dynasties of China: Part 1</u>

  • Shang Dynasty (c.1600-1050 BC)
  • Zhou Dynasty (1050-256 BC)
  • Han Dynasty (206 BC-AD 220)
  • Sui Dynasty (581-617)/Tang Dynasty (618-907)
  • Song Dynasty (960-1276)

( You Question Is Incomplete )

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The line-item veto challenges the notion of A) senatorial courtesy B) congressional oversight C) federalism D) executive privile
Alex777 [14]

Answer:  E) separation of powers

Explanation:

The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.

Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.

It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.

This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was george s. patton given comand of a fake army before the d day invasion
    13·2 answers
  • The African National Congress called for armed resistance against the white South African government after the arrest of their l
    15·1 answer
  • What is the progressive era?
    5·2 answers
  • ILL PICK YOU AS BRAINLIEST I NEED THE ANSWER!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • How did the anaconda plan and shermans march affect southerners​
    7·1 answer
  • When did the first world were begin?​
    5·2 answers
  • In what way did late nineteenth-century Japanese colonial rule in the Ryukyu Islands differ from that of the British in India or
    7·1 answer
  • How were the Islamic lands governed from 900 to 1400, and what new challenges did
    5·1 answer
  • Madison and de tocqueville both believed that voluntary groups ________
    6·1 answer
  • Cuál de las siguientes naciones no tuvo un gran imperio colonial en América del Norte? *
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!