Answer:
The personal tale of both are mention below:
Explanation:
The individual stories that Carlos Munoz and Paula Crisostomo shared were that cops made tranquil dissent into ruthless circumstances and that she didn't have the foggiest idea what school was and she didn't generally have a controlling hand to apply to one, respectively.
Both of them fundamentally expressed how tough it was being Latin in school and attempting to create the best for their lives.
<span>The Venezuelan people gave Hugo Chavez a referendum to rewrite their constitution and implement a socialism.</span>
<u>Let's match each type of power with its definition</u>
- concurrent powers: <u>powers that both national and state governments have/do such as collecting taxes </u>. They refer to those powers which are shared by the different goverment levels existing in the federal structure: at the federal, state, province and local levels.
- delegated powers: <u>Powers specifically given to the national government such as establishing post offices.</u> These are also known as enumerated powers and are contained in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States.
- denied powers: <u>powers neither the federal or state government have (such as making a law that would prevent the establishment of religion). </u>These are powers which cannot be exercised by any level within a federal goverment, for example, allowing slavery (explicitly forbidden by 13th Amendment) denying voting rights to certain citizens (explicitly condemned in the Voting Rights Act from 1965).
- implied powers: <u>powers that are suggested and allowed due to the necessary and proper/elastic clause such as establishing the interstate highway system. </u>These powers are not explicitly included in the US Constitution but can be derived from others than are.
- inherent powers: <u> </u><u>powers that don't have to be given in the Constitution - they are just a part of government, such as protecting the country from attack</u>. These are goverment powers which are not explicitly stated in a Constitution but are implicit in a sovereign state and for its rulers.
Actually, the 18th century is the 1700's. Just as we are in the 2000s, we are considered the 21st century.
I believe the correct answer is actually:
"1. the election results were challenged in court up to five weeks after the election"
