Answer and Explanation:
A. Because plagiarism is a crime and contradicts an attorney's moral and ethical code. This takes away all the credibility of the lawyer, shows that he is not able to hold the position, in addition to showing that he acts in criminal activities of high gravity and therefore must be punished immediately and have his profession questioned.
B. The Iowa court referred to other cases involving plagiarism, which is the practice that allows someone else's works and words to be copied without due credit. Cases of plagiarism are very common and the Iowa court must treat everyone with the same severity in order for them to be fought.
Answer:
Justice Jackson's characterization of Marshall's Gibbon's opinion was correct because it helped lay down the foundation for railroads and pipelines, minimum wage regulation and prohibition of child labor. What did the Court say about enslaved African Americans' position in the United States in Dred Scott v.
Explanation:
We need the passage first
Answer:
E
Explanation:
Because its something you can see and hold you can pick it up :)
Answer:
if I were juror in murder case, the I would conduct all the scientific evidence, and if it still conflicts with ALL the witnesses I would not believe the witnesses. but I still would not announce my decision. I would want more evidences and proofs to announce my decision because I just can't rely only on scientific evidence, (what if the person who murdered changed the fingerprints and other scientific evidence, you never know)
