Answer: The United States won because it stopped the spread of communism in South Korea. The Korean Peninsula had the same borders at the end of the war as it did at the beginning.

Explanation:

Both statements are factual, and we can take both into account. America and its allies have stopped the advance of communist forces from the north of the Korean peninsula, which were supported by Chinese authorities, and material aid from the Soviet Union. If America and the Allies did not get involved, the Korean peninsula would look like the northern part today. Therefore, the Western powers have stopped the penetration of totalitarianism into the territory of North Korea.

On the other hand, the war did not bring about any significant territorial changes. In the war, the domination of both sides was changing. At the end of the war, a "38th parallel" was established, representing the border between the two warring parties (since officially no Korean recognized the end of the conflict).

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare and contrast the ways that seventeenth-century

Lina20 [59]

Answer:

<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>

3 0

3 years ago

The efforts on feminist activist in the 1960s and 1970s led most directly to which outcome

IrinaK [193]

It led to the increase of attention issues involving <span>women's health, violence against women.

</span>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers