The statement that the Supreme Court must reach a unanimous decision for a ruling to be valid is false.
<h3>What is the purpose of the supreme court?</h3>
Supreme court, the highest law making authority/final arbiter of a country(U.S.) it works under the motto" Equal justice for all under the law". In the United States, nine justices serve in the supreme court.
The Supreme Court judges do not have to unanimously agree to a decision for a ruling to be valid. So the above statement is false. Majority rules apply, but the dissenting judge's opinion is also published. For example: as, four out of the nine must vote in favor to accept the case.
Therefore, it can be said the above statement is false.
Learn more about supreme court here:
brainly.com/question/12848156
Feeling B not quite sure tho
They got help from people
Answer:
I believe that the United States was and wasn't justified to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Explanation:
It was justified because Japan realized a surprise attack at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, after two hours of bombing, 18 U.S. ships were sunk or damaged, 188 U.S. aircraft were destroyed, and 2,403 people were killed, all of this happened while the U.S. and Japan were officially engaging in diplomatic negotiations for possible peace in Asia.
It wasn't justified because the two bombings killed between 129,000 and 226,000 people.
Answer:
Opportunity drives individuals and countries to take chances. When Mexico ended Spanish reign and declared their independence in 1821, the young country was poised to become a superpower of the Americas. With northern territories stretching from modern-day California to ports in the Gulf of Mexico, it seemed the country had the ingredients to amass vast wealth through many possibilities. One relatively lawless and rural territory caught Mexico's attention for growth soon after independence: Texas.
Explanation:
