Answer:
Hammurabi’s Code provides some of the earliest examples of the doctrine of “lex talionis,” or the laws of retribution, sometimes better known as “an eye for an eye.”
The 282 edicts are all written in if-then form. For example, if a man steals an ox, then he must pay back 30 times its value. The edicts range from family law to professional contracts and administrative law, often outlining different standards of justice for the three classes of Babylonian society—the propertied class, freedmen and slaves.
The paragraph is missing analysis connecting the argument--that the Executive Order was unconstitutional--to the evidence.
The paragraph does a good job explaining the context of Executive Order 9066 and what the order entailed. It ends the paragraph with the argument that the order was unconstitutional. However, there is no explanation of why the order is unconstitutional. The writer needs to explain how the Executive Order violated constitutional rights. The argument would be even more solid if it included the specific amendments or clauses that the order violated.
Although slavery was abolished, there is still a lack or respect between races, and still a lot of racism. After slavery ended there was still segregation between the races which then resulted in the civil rights movement. The institution of slavery affects the world today, minorities are still being treated with less respect and dignity, just like how minorities were treated during the time of slavery.
Andrew Johnson was the 17th POTUS