1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
balu736 [363]
3 years ago
5

Define Originalism. What are the negatives and positives of Originalism?

History
1 answer:
andre [41]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

hey Emana! i hope this will help you!

Explanation:

In the context of United States law, originalism is a concept regarding the interpretation of the Constitution that asserts that all statements in the constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding of the authors or the people at the time it was ratified.  

Pros and cons

Pros

• If a constitution no longer meets the exigencies of a society's "evolving standard of decency", and the people wish to amend or replace the document, there is nothing stopping them from doing so in the manner which was envisioned by the drafters: through the amendment process. The Living Constitution approach would thus only be valuable in the absence of an amendment process.

• Originalism deters judges from unfettered discretion to inject their personal values into constitutional interpretation. Before one can reject originalism, one must find another criterion for determining the meaning of a provision, lest the "opinion of this Court [rest] so obviously upon nothing however the personal views of its members". Scalia has averred that "there is no other" criterion to constrain judicial interpretation.  

• Originalism helps ensure predictability and protects against arbitrary changes in the interpretation of a constitution; to reject originalism implicitly repudiates the theoretical underpinning of another theory of stability in the law, stare decisis.

• Contrary to critics of originalism, originalists do not always agree upon an answer to a constitutional question, nor is there any requirement that they have to. There is room for disagreement as to what original meaning was, and even more as to how that original meaning applies to the situation before the court. But the originalist at least knows what he is looking for: the original meaning of the text. Usually, that is easy to discern and simple to apply.  

Cons

• Legal controversy rarely arises over constitutional text with uncontroversial interpretations. How, then, does one determine the original "meaning" of an originally broad and ambiguous phrase? Thus, originalists often conceal their choice between levels of generality or possible alternative meanings as required by the original meaning when there is considerable room for disagreement.

• Originalism allows the dead hand of prior generations to control important contemporary issues to an extraordinary and unnecessary level of detail. While everyone agrees that broad constitutional principles should control, if the question is whether abortion is a fundamental right, why should past centuries-old intentions be controlling? The originalist's distinction between original meaning and original intention here is unclear due to the difficulty of discussing meaning in terms of specific details that the Constitutional text does not clarify.

• In writing such a broad phrase such as "cruel and unusual", it is considered implausible by some that the framers intended for its very specific meaning at that time to be permanently controlling. The purpose of phrases such as "cruel and unusual," rather, is specifically not to specify which punishments are forbidden, but to create a flexible test that can be applied over future centuries. Stated alternatively, there is no reason to think the framers have a privileged position in making this determination of what is cruel and unusual; while their ban on cruel punishment is binding on us, their understanding of the scope of the concept "cruel" need not be.

• If applied scrupulously, originalism requires the country either to continually reratify the Constitution in order to retain contemporary standards for tests such as "cruel and unusual punishment" or "unreasonable searches and seizures," or to change the language to specifically state that these tests shall be administered according to the standards of the society administering the test. Critics of originalism believe that the first approach is too burdensome, while the second is already inherently implied.

You might be interested in
Which Colonial area or areas placed A high value on religious freedom
vagabundo [1.1K]
<span>New England and Middle.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
In approximately what year did printed newsletters begin circulating in Europe? 
Pavel [41]
Im not sure, but i think that its c. i hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Democratic Party is generally considered more libra then the Republican Party because its members and elected officials Norm
Stells [14]
The answer to this question is: <span>extending the "social safety net" rather than cutting taxes</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need to know the answer ASAP if your right I’ll make you that brain thing
Igoryamba

Answer: I think its b but correct me if im rong

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source (the link you provided); provide an accurate summary
NeX [460]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the previous link was not attached, we can say the following.

The central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source are the following,

A primary resource comes from the people who witnessed the event, the incident, or the specific moment. These people could have written their own descriptions, testimonies, books, or maybe journalists that directly reported what happened. It also could be an interview with people who were part of the historical event. For instance, if it is a soldier that participated in the Vietnam War, a journalist can interview him and use it as a primary source.

On the other hand, secondary sources can be obtained from other sources that were not direct. This could be an author that based its story in other investigations, or it could be encyclopedias.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What event helped president johnson to gain support for social reforms?
    5·2 answers
  • The belief in many gods is called
    9·1 answer
  • Imagine that, on June 28, 1914, as Gavrilo Princip was about to shoot Archduke Ferdinand, his gun jammed, and the archduke survi
    5·1 answer
  • What did the aborigines believe about the land in the past?
    6·1 answer
  • 7. John Kennedy is sometimes referred to as the "television president" A. As he was the first president to appear on television
    14·1 answer
  • Ways that Hitler gained the support of the police.
    7·1 answer
  • What are some countries with a rigid constitution
    9·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Intolerable Acts?
    14·2 answers
  • What is Izzy doing in this part of the story
    6·2 answers
  • What island off of the coast of Italy did the American first send troops into the European theater of World War II?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!