I agree with Pavlov that Nicholas and Alexandra were not suited by personality to be rulers of a country such as Russia. In that sense, they contributed to the start of the Revolution;however, there were other factors at work, because the forces that led to the Revolution happening had been developing for years in Russia, long before the birth of Nicholas II, even. So these factors seem to have been more at work than Alexandra's personality and actions in causing the Revolution. Also, Queen Mary, King George V and the British royal family were constituentional monarchs, it must be kept in mind, which is rather different than being an autocrat like Nicholas II was, or an autocrat's consort, as Alexandra was. I think Nicholas would have made an excellant constitutional monarch, but he wasn't suited to be an autocrat. So the difference that the Romanovs, especially Nicholas and Alexandra had a lot of power, whereas the British royal family actually had very little power must be borne in mind, although it's true that Alexandra's personality and attitude was likely not suited to even being the consort of a constituentional monarch, and also Nicholas II was not a good autocrat.
Answer:
Explanation:
In general terms, a radical is one who wants “root and branch” change (Latin: Radix, a root), based on the sense of certainty that a set of principles should be applied, principles that run counter to those involved in the status quo.
Its true opposite is conservative. A classic conservative is very wary of drastic change based on a set of a priori principles, because given the fallen state of man, and the fallibility of human reason, it is better to retain at least those elements of things as they are that are sort of working. Given the horrors released by many revolutions, there is a lot of empirical evidence to support this view.
Answer:
mammoth
Explanation:
they generally used leg bones like femurs for their shear size and density
The answer is D. I just looked it up to make sure :D
The best answer would be the first statement. In general the forms of civic responsibility that were acceptable for women in the 1800s was to write essays and to speak to other women. Because of the patriarchal society dominated by men, they aren't allowed to participate in political affairs.