Answer:
yes that should definitely be illegal
Answer:
NPV= $4,079.63
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Initial cost= -$20,000
Rate of return= 10%
<u>To calculate the net present value, we need to use the following formula:</u>
NPV= -Io + ∑[Cf/(1+i)^n]
<u>First, we need to discount the cash flows:</u>
PV= Cfn / (1+i)^n
Cf1= 5,000/1.1= 4,545.45
Cf2= 10,000/1.1^2= 8,264.46
Cf3= 15,000/1.1^3= 11,269.72
Total PV= $24,079.63
Now, the NPV:
NPV= -20,000 + 24,079.63
NPV= $4,079.63
Answer:
a. It is a collection of all accounts with their activity and balances that exist in a business. - A general ledger
The General Ledger is the central record in an accounting system and contains a record of all financial transactions in the company.
b. It is a book of original entry that includes a chronological record of all transactions that Have occurred within a business during a period occurred. - A Journal
When a transaction takes place in a business, it is recorded first in a Journal. As such, a journal contains a chronological record of all transactions that have occurred within a business during a period occurred.
c. It is a list of each account and its balance at any given time and is used to verify that debits = credits
. - Trial Balance
The Trial Balance helps a business balance its debits and credits by listing them so then equating them to verify that indeed the debits match the credits.
d. It is a list of all ledger accounts which exist in a business and includes an identification number assigned to each account
. - A chart of accounts
Answer:
a. The company must have had net income equal to zero in 2009.
Explanation:
If on its 2008 balance sheet, Sherman Books showed a balance of retained earnings equal to $510 million, and on its 2009 balance sheet, the balance of retained earnings was also equal to $510 million; then what is true is that the company must have had net income equal to zero in 2009.
Retained earnings is the profit amount or net income left over and taken back into the business after it has paid out dividends to its shareholders.
However it is unlikely that the company will pay out the entire amount it earns in a particular year but a percentage of earnings.
In the case of Sherman, it is unlikely that the company made a profit of $200 million and paid out every bit as dividends to shareholders but what is most likely is that there was no profit made for retention in 2009
